|
Baltimore Sun
Endorses Slots (3 of 3)
The anticipation of slot game revenue alone would
allow lawmakers to breathe a little easier and make the choice to
borrow against cash reserves with the knowledge that it could
inevitably be repaid. The devices would bring untold masses of new
patrons to Maryland’s horse racing establishments, which have been
in crisis and decline for years. Jobs connected to the horse racing
industry would be maintained, and the horse breeding and farming
businesses would stay intact, perhaps staving off “relentless”
suburban sprawl.
This is not to say that the newspaper’s endorsement of the
controversial gambling devices is completely wholehearted. The Sun
editorial remained critical of slot machine proponents, who have
made a number of statements regarding expanded gambling that may be
construed as “misleading.” The Sun’s biggest concern is the
almost-inevitable increase in problem (or addicted) gambling that
will come with easier access to these one-armed bandits.
Additionally, the paper cites “bankruptcy, family dissolution, and
crime” as risks tied in with a greater percentage of slots
throughout the state. Although the Legislature has already promised
to earmark funds for the treatment of problem gamblers in the event
of the law’s passage, the Sun argues that such an effort would
hardly be fully sufficient “to ameliorate the adverse impact” of the
newly-legal slot games. The article suggested that faculty from the
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health should be
commissioned to examine and evaluate the issue.
The editorial concludes with the statement that O’Malley and state
lawmakers will still undoubtedly be plagued with “painful” decisions
vis a vis the troubled economy, but that the damage to Marylanders’
quality of life without the slot machine income would be too great
to bear.
Back to October 2008 Archive.
|